Hypocrisy, Bureaucracy, Threats To Our Democracy

Inside Washington's Web of Family Traditions

I can remember a time in which all politicians would go to such great lengths to tell voters whatever it is they wish to hear, even if it means telling a lie. Their greatest strength has always been to lie or deny while looking directly into our eyes. Although many of the roles remain predetermined, the the rules by which politicians legislate have undergone very progressive changes. The order to which they serve are growing anxious, as they near the final stages of their master plan known as the Great Reset. We have entered a new age in which the Left now has their pieces in place and have taken to the offensive at an unrelenting pace. Neo Cons on the right have fundamentally acted as the constant, allowing for so many variables to factor into the equation.

Humanity has reached an apex, the majority have annexed their pinnacle within the great awakening, and the Left have become far more revealing. They're spiritual awakening or spiritual antagonist has manifest itself in a way that leaves little doubt that their reputation precedes itself and their actions of which are now self evident. An example of which I wish to speak, involves the Ranking Member of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, representing Maryland's 8th Congressional District in the United States House of Representatives, Democrat Jamie Raskin. Raskin has inherited both his liberalism and radicalism as dominant traits from his father, and he places such traits on display for the whole world to see, and he does so unapologetically. Anyone with an ear to the street, that's hip to geopolitical beats will be familiar with Raskin’s recent sentiments that have been echoed all throughout social media this week, outlining what is apparently the Democrat's contingency plan if Donald Trump were to be once again elected President of the United States.

Incase you missed the video clip, Raskin made a very bold statement in reference to the Supreme Court's interpretation of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution in relation to Colorado's Secretary of State's plot to remove President Trump from the state's primary election ballot based on his own individual interpretation. Raskin stated, “And so the court wants to kick it to Congress, so it's going to be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified. And then we need bodyguards for everybody and Civil War conditions all because nine justices - not all of them, but these Justices that have not many cases to look at every year, not much work to do, have a huge staff, great protection -simply do not want to do their job and interpret what the great 14th Amendment means.” Personally, I'm not sure that there has ever been a time in which one statement, made by just one Congressman, has ever consisted of so many implications.

First and foremost, Raskin confirmed my own suspicions that the Democratic Party has no intention of allowing President Trump a clear path to the Presidency, even if the upcoming election is presumed to be free and fair. Set aside the fact that the Maryland Representative is undermining the United States Supreme Court for just a moment, but pay close attention to the fact that the gentlemen from Maryland is also jeopardizing the integrity of the very committee of which he serves as Ranking Member, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability. He clearly proclaims that Congress will interfere with the results of a national election. The focus of my final point, however, centers around the audacity for any one member of the the U.S. House Select Investigative Committee on the events of January 6, 2021 to suggest that he, or his colleagues, plan not to incite an insurrection or riot, but instead incite a national civil war on the grounds of his or her own land is absurd, hypocritical, seditious, and treasonous beyond all belief. Moreover, I find the fact that this man has not yet been presented with articles of impeachment is absolutely astounding. I wish to provide a better understanding of the inherent mindset of this individual and further validate my claim that the vast majority of elected federal government officials are born with a predetermined destiny due to their biological legacy or pedigree. In order to do just that, I will begin by taking a glimpse at who Jamie Raskin is and from who, what, where, and how he has arrived in the the swamp of Washington D.C. politics.

The apple doesn'tfall far from the tree. Jamin “Jamie” Ben Raskin was born in Washington D.C. and was given his middle name Ben in honor of his grandfather. Both Raskin's paternal grandmother and grandfather were of Jewish faith and had immigrated to the United States from Russia. Ben is alleged to have worked as a plumber, although my intuition challenges such a notion. Please allow me to explain. Jamie Raskin's father, Marcus Raskin, left home at the age of 16 to study piano performance at Julliard, which is one of the most prestigious, if not perhaps the most prestigious music school in the entire country. Julliard is not typically considered to be an institution in which just anyone from any background would be welcome in off the street. Raskin's father Marcus then gave up his musical aspirations to enroll in John D Rockefeller's University of Chicago, another institution not normally thought of as one in which the student body would be comprised of scholars originating from the average blue collar home. According to Wikipedia files, Marcus was a prized student of Rexford Tugwell, an economist and member of American socialist and President Franklin D Roosevelt's brain trust, in addition to legal scholar Quincy Wright. Marcus served as an assistant to the latter while attending law school. Marcus Raskin graduated from the University of Chicago in 1954, receiving a Bachelor of Arts in “Liberal Arts” and earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Chicago in 1957. Raskin's father moved to the District of Columbia the following year where he began working as legislative counsel to a group of liberal congressmen, the likes of which included California's James Roosevelt, the eldest son of Socialist President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Marcus Raskin then assumed the role of Secretary to the “Liberal Project”, a group of House liberals that formed a liberal leadership group co-founded by Robert Kastenmeier and James Roosevelt. As Secretary, Marcus Raskin introduced members of the U.S. House of Representatives to scholars such as sociologist David Riesman, historian and former financial advisor to FDR, H. Stuart Hughes, and James Paul Warburg. Warburg's father, Paul, one of the four horsemen of the banking cartel and financiers of eastern communism, was also one of the principal architects of the Federal Reserve System. Warburg served as a board member and eventually the second Vice Chair of the Federal Reserve. Paul married the daughter of Solomom Loeb, founder of the Kuhn & Loeb Bank, of whom Paul Warburg became a partner. Paul's brother Felix married the daughter of Jacob Schiff, supporter of the Communist Bolshevik Revolution and a senior partner at Kuhn & Loeb. Think Adam Schiff, the Congressman and Senatorial candidate from California. Is it making sense yet that Jamie Raskin and Adam Schiff are both currently two of the most radical liberal members of Congress? As a side note, Warburg also served as a director of the Council on Foreign Relations and trustee of the Brookings Institute, a board member of Wells Fargo Bank, advocated for the Central Banking system, and was part of the brain trust that procured the funding that had thrust Adolf Hitler's meteoric rise as dictator of Nazi Germany. These are all important ties to the Raskin family.

In 1961, Marcus Raskin was hired as an assistant to McGeorge Bundy on national security affairs and disarmament as a member of the Special Staff of the National Security Council. If the name Bundy does not stand out as a name of particular interest, it will then be my pleasure to inform you that the Bundy family is one of the thirteen original bloodlines of the most powerful of all Secret society occults, known all over the world as the illuminati. In 1962, the connection to Bundy landed Marcus Raskin his membership in the U.S. Delegation to an eighteen nation disarmament conference in Geneva, Switzerland, home to the war machine's Geneva Convention, next door to Klaus Schwab and the globalist elite’s World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Raskin also remained an aid to the National Security Council under the administration of President John F Kennedy, leaving government work during the year of Kennedy's assassination to join a former official from the U.S. Department of State's Arms Control & Disarmament Agency, a man by the name of Richard Barnet. The pair co-founded the Institute for Policy Studies, a liberal think tank. Marcus Raskin and four other antiwar activists working within the institute were indicted on federal charges of conspiracy to counsel young men to violate draft laws, as it relates to the Vietnam War. The elder Raskin was the only activist not convicted, but he and Barnet's Institute would be under FBI surveillance throughout the 1960's and 1970's and found themselves on President Richard Nixon's supposed enemies list. In 1970, Raskin received from Daniel Ellsburg, of the Rand Corporation, parts of a classified study unmasking the United States Government's motives for pursuing involvement in the Vietnam War. That study later became known as the Pentagon Papers. Raskin contacted Neil Sheehan of the New York Times to inquire their interest in publishing highly classified materials. Raskin supplied approximately two hundred pages in addition to the name of the author who later gave the Times the seven yhousand plus page report in it'sentirety. In 1971, both the Times and Washington Post had published stories that were supported by excerpts from the original documents. During the late 1970's, Marcus directed a Congressional project at the request of more than fifty members of Congress who's aim was at analyzing the federal budget, which prompted Raskin to author a book that was titled “The Federal Budget and Social Reconstruction”. One of Marcus Raskin's last known works of his lifetime was as editor of a series of books outlining the Institute for Policy Studies’ “Path For the 21st Century”, of which stated goals were to generate ideas and proposals across disciplinary lines predicated on Raskins’ ideals of “reconstructive knowledge, which catalyze citizen action and help other scholars and activists pursue a progressive basis for a new society”. That sounds more like the forward to a socialist/communist manifesto than goals of a liberal think tank.

Now, we will examine the similarities shared by Marcus Raskin and his son Jamie, who is nothing less than a modern day border line socialist with the potential to be a communist. As previously mentioned, Jamie Raskin was born in Washington D.C. where he graduated from Georgetown Day School in 1979 at the age of 16 years. Representative Raskin was a member of Phi Beta Kappa at Harvard College, graduating magna cum laude in 1983 while earning a Bachelor of Arts in Government with a concentration in Political Theory. Raskin was also a 1987 graduate, with magna cum laude honors, and received a Juris Doctor degree from Harvard University School of Law where he also worked as editor of Harvard Law Review. He went on to co-found and direct the LL.M. Program on Law and Government and also co-founded the Marshall Brennan Constitutional Literacy Program during a twent-five year career as a Professor of Constitutional Law at American University Washington College of Law. The idea that a radical liberal with socialist views, who regularly attempts to subvert the constitution by empowering unelected bureaucrats to govern the citizens of what was at one time a Constitutional Republic, one who is purposely ignorant to the obvious injuries inflicted upon the integrity of our electoral processes, continues to allow violations that infringe upon our First Amendment right to free spech, while advocating for the abolishment of our Second Amendment right to bear arms, had spent an entire two-decsde career teaching Constitutional Law at one of the finest institutions of higher learning that our country has to offer, is such an outright contradiction of itself that it absolutely blows my mind.

The younger Raskin was hired to serve as General Counsel for the Reverend Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition from 1989 - 1990, representing Ross Perot in 1996, as it pertained to Perot's exclusion from participation in the 1996 Presidential debates. Raskin penned an op-ed in the Washington Post, in which he harshly criticized the actions of the Federal Elections Commision and the Commission on Presidential Debates. In 1999, Raskin received an appointment by Maryland Governor Parris Glendening to become the state's first chairman of the Higher Education Labor Relations Board. He would soon get his first taste of politics by serving in the capacity of campaign manager for Doug Gansler's bid to become Maryland State Attorney General in the 2006 election cycle, while simultanepusly running his own campaign for public office that same year. Raskin was victorious, elected by the voters within his district, to the Maryland State Senate, defeating the incumbent in the 2006 primary election. Raskin then ran unopposed as the lone candidate in the District 20 Senatorial race, winning in unanimous fashion. As a Maryland State Senator, Raskin represented Maryland's 20th District, during which time he became a member of the Judicial Proceedings Committee, was named Chairperson of the Select Committee on Ethics Reform, the Montgomery County Senate Delegation, and in 2012, became the Maryland State Senate Majority Whip for the Democrat Party. Raskin thought of himself as a hands-on progressive state senator, advocating for both the repeal of Maryland's death penalty and the legalization of same-sex marriage in the state of Maryland. By 2016, Jamie Raskin announced his candidacy for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives to represent Maryland's 8th Congressional District, exhibiting enough socialist ideals to garner endorsements from Bernie Sanders afiliated organizations, the likes of “Our Revolution” and “People's Action”, both helpful in earning 60% of the vote to defeat Republican Dan Cox.

U.S. Representative Raskin made a name for himself from the early going when he joined several of his fellow House members in their objections to certify the results of the 2016 Presidential election, offering reasons such as the alleged Russian collusion hoax, and purported claims of voter suppression by the Republican Party in certain swing states. Their objection was over-ruled by former Senate President who was also U.S. Vice President Joe Biden who cited lack of co-sponsorship from each of the two chambers of Congress in support of their objections. Later that year, Raskin was chief sponsor of proposed legislation aimed at challenging the President's overall ability to perform the duties of the office of the Presidency as a means by which they had sought to vacate the Presidency by invocation of the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. That legislation failed to pass. Raskin voted in favor of the Equality Act in 2019, a staunch adversary discriminatory practices based on one's sexual orientation and gender identity,. (I do not share in the belief that one may identify as an alternative gender from that which one is born.) In 2018, Raskin co-founded and co-chaired the Congressional Free Thought Caucus, despite governing against the right to speak freely about one's own free thoughts. It's main goal is to push public policy that is formed on the premise of “reason” , “science” (Covid protocols) , and “moral values” . These are all goals that have yet to be reflective in the actions by either Congressman Raskin, nor that of his father Marcus Raskin.

On July 1, 2021, Raskin was one of seven House Democrats appointed by then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, to serve as members of the U.S. House Select Committe on the January 6th Attacks. After accepting the appointment, Raskin released this rhetoric laced diatribe: “As chair of the Oversight Committees, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Sub-Committee, I've helped lead the Oversight Committee's painstaking investigation into violent white supremacy over the last two years. The Department of Homeland Security has declared domestic violent extremism the number one security threat in the country. We saw that threat explode right before our eyes at the capitol on January 6.” On July 12, 2022, Jamie Raskin, along with Stephanie Murphy, co-led the seventh hearing on the events of January 6, 2021, which focused on the organizational roles that the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers were alleged to have played. In Raskin's closing statements for that hearing, Raskin was quoted as saying,”When Donald Trump sent out his tweet, he became the first President ever to call for a crowd to descend on the capitol city to block the Constitutional transfer of power.” Raskin continued, “On January 6, Trump knew that the crowd was angry. He knew the crowd was armed. He sent them to the capitol anyway. We need to defend both our democracy and our freedom with everything we have and declare that this American carnage ends here and now. In a world of resurgent authoritarianism, and racism, and antisemitism, let's all hang tough for American democracy.” Well, my rebuttal to that statement begins by my saying that, no, President Trump did not lnow that anyone in the crowd that day was armed. I was at that rally on January 6, 2021, and I did not see a single soul who had visibly appeared to have been armed. I would also like to make it known for the record, that nothing within Raskin's statement, or the cause for which that particular rally was held, was in any way remotely related to racism, antisemitism, and for God's sake, from the very inception of this nation, this union of states was bound together and established with the intentions of always remaining a Constitutional Republic. We are not intended to be a democracy. I for one, hope to never be a democracy, because once a democracy, a nation will begin a transformation procrss that begins by radicalizing its over-reaching calls for equality, stripping every member of society, of everything they have ever earned, until everyone begins a neutral starting point. This is accomplished by means of universal living wages. Thus, securing for those that govern and maintain control of all wealth, that of an entire society dependent upon the ruling class. Sovereignty will quickly be eroded until the enslaved state is completely powerless and defenseless against it's tyrannical oppressor's socialist policies, and until that dictator has become fully empowered to govern in a communist militaristic fashion. I find it ironic that Marcus Raskin's mantra was once ever so hyper-fixated on resistance to authority, yet the ties he had built for himself and the model of which his son has set to be in the image for which he hopes to forever govern, provide so much contrast that they are so unconventionally similar. Raskin has already fallen short of achieving the ethical and moral reforms that inspired his career, but his wife may be equally to blame.

Raskin is married to Sarah Bloom Raskin, Marylands Commisioner on Financial Regulation with her service beginning year 2007 and ending in 2010. Mrs Raskin received the Presidential nomination from Barack Obama to serve on the board of directors for the Federal Reserve in April 2010, later being sworn in by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke as Governor of the Federal Reserve Board in October of that same year. Joe Biden later nominated Sarah Raskin to serve in the capacity of Federal Reserve Chairperson, but the Republican members of Senate boycotted her confirmation hearing and Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia objected to her confirmation due to the intentions of her monetary policies prioritizing the funding of programs designed to mitigate climate change. This left Congressman Raskin’s wife no other choice but to withdrawal her recent nomination

She the accepted the role of Deputy Secretary of the United States Treasury, a position she held for approximately three years. Nearly five years later, in February 2022, Sarah Raskin's name had again become the topic of discussion while being included in consideration for candidacy to fill the vacanct position of the Federal Reserve's Vice Chairperson of Supervision. However, Mrs Raskin's name was removed from consideration as the result of her committing a violation of the Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge Act due to failure to properly disclose transactions of her shares. Sarah Raskin was found to be in violation not only once, but on two isolated occasions. The Maryland Representative's wife first failed to disclose stock that she had received in exchange for advisory work that she had provided a Colorado-based financial technology trust company. The next cited occurrence involved her sale of stock in a Reserve Trust in the amount of $1.5 million. She had waited eight months to be forthcoming with a disclosure detailing the information pertaining to that particular transaction. Mrs Raskin may be guilty of one other transgression while sitting on the advisory board to the Federal Reserve when it had granted Reserve Trust Unusual Access to it's master account. Thus far, it remains unclear as to when she first acquired the shares. From business ties that clearly link some of the most powerful and influential of names and titles to the continuation of a legacy that now spans multiple generations, hopefully I have helped to create a better understanding for all and in doing so, possibly have painted a much more clear picture of the Hypocrisy, Bureaucracy, Threats to our “Democracy” inside Washington's Web of Family Traditions.